The Transplant

Photo courtesy of LL Jones

Gloria sat listening to a load of technical information. What she wanted was to get on with the practical bit.

“So we have implanted a right optical apparatus from one of our S-73 droids to replace the eye you lost in the accident,” the Cyberoptometrist  concluded.

“What do I do now?” Gloria asked with a little too much impatience.

The man walked to the far side of the room and held up a old style personal communications device.

“Keeping your right eye closed,” he instructed, “I would like to know how many images of yourself you can see.”

“Excuse me?” she challenged.

“Sorry. Look into the device you should see an image of yourself.  In the glasses you should see your reflection.  In the reflected image there should be another reflection visible.  How many images of yourself can you count?”

She struggled at the distance and tried to count the increasingly shrinking images.

“Four, but only three clearly,” she responded.

“Now with the right eye,” he instructed.

Gloria sat quietly for quite some time, then announced, “Seventy-three clearly, and eight more as shrinking dots.”

“Excellent,” the CyberOpt said, impressed with his own work.

Padre

(198 words)

Sunday Photo Fiction – Sep 8 2019

“Untouchable”

b5345f874f19dab4655cbc09655c33bd--church-ideas-sunday-school

Jesus Heals a Leper (freebibleimages.org)

The world has a sad history of treating certain individuals as “untouchable.” Whether these “outcasts” are ones bearing disease, or whether they are considered morally or spiritually inferior, they have borne the burden of exclusion.

At what cost are people excluded? Mother Theresa of Calcutta remarked “Being unwanted is the worst disease any human being can experience.” She set out to serve the “poorest of the poor,” those with disease, and hardship that others shunned, but who she saw as “Christ in disguise (a reference to the parable of the sheep and goats).”

She was not alone in this compassion shown to the unwanted.  The Hindu caste system had long held that the lowest social grouping were “untouchables.”  These people who carried out the most menial and dirty tasks in society were beneath contempt. Mahatma Gandhi called for an end of such a status, and said that rather than being seen as “untouchable,” that they should be instead be seen as “children of God (Harijans).”

While Theresa and Gandhi’s views are admirable, they fall short of the marvelous example of Jesus when dealing with outcasts. First Century Jewish culture was replete with those who were at the margins of society, whether as literal lepers (unclean owing to disease) or those who conduct or life circumstances made them “unclean.”

Let me first look at the attitude of many of the religious elite of Jesus’ day.  In Luke 10: 25-37 Jesus presented a parable we call “The Good Samaritan.” Verses 30 to 32 are telling,

“A man was going down from Jerusalem to Jericho, when he was attacked by robbers. They stripped him of his clothes, beat him and went away, leaving him half dead.  A priest happened to be going down the same road, and when he saw the man, he passed by on the other side.  So too, a Levite, when he came to the place and saw him, passed by on the other side.” 

Both the priest and the Levite avoid the injured man, and it is postulated that they were doing so in order not to come in contact with “the dead” and thus become ritually unclean.

Yet, we see a very different attitude from Jesus, Himself.  Luke 7 gives us an insight again into Jesus’ heart in contrast to that of a Pharisee.

“When one of the Pharisees invited Jesus to have dinner with him, he went to the Pharisee’s house and reclined at the table.  A woman in that town who lived a sinful life learned that Jesus was eating at the Pharisee’s house, so she came there with an alabaster jar of perfume.  As she stood behind him at his feet weeping, she began to wet his feet with her tears. Then she wiped them with her hair, kissed them and poured perfume on them. When the Pharisee who had invited him saw this, he said to himself, “If this man were a prophet, he would know who is touching him and what kind of woman she is—that she is a sinner (vs 36 -39).”

Jesus’ response to the situation, is not to be repulsed, or to reprimand her for her actions, but to praise her (presumably to the shock of His host).

“Then he turned toward the woman and said to Simon, “Do you see this woman? I came into your house. You did not give me any water for my feet,but she wet my feet with her tears and wiped them with her hair.  You did not give me a kiss, but this woman, from the time I entered, has not stopped kissing my feet. You did not put oil on my head,but she has poured perfume on my feet. Therefore, I tell you, her many sins have been forgiven—as her great love has shown. But whoever has been forgiven little loves little.” Then Jesus said to her, “Your sins are forgiven (vs 44 – 48).”

This encounter with “a sinner” is interesting as He shows an acceptance of her, and does not seem concerned at “being tarred with the same brush.”  But this event prefigures and encounter with another outcast, who again touches Him.  On this occasion, however, the ceremonial uncleanliness is manifest.  Yet, the response the same.

In Luke 8 we find the account of the woman with the issue of blood.

And a woman was there who had been subject to bleeding for twelve years, but no one could heal her.  She came up behind him and touched the edge of his cloak, and immediately her bleeding stopped. “Who touched me?” Jesus asked. When they all denied it, Peter said, “Master, the people are crowding and pressing against you.” But Jesus said, “Someone touched me; I know that power has gone out from me.” Then the woman, seeing that she could not go unnoticed, came trembling and fell at his feet. In the presence of all the people, she told why she had touched him and how she had been instantly healed.  Then he said to her, “Daughter, your faith has healed you. Go in peace (vs 43 -48).”

Leviticus 15 makes it clear that women’s discharge of blood is “unclean,” and those encountering are made unclean as well.

“Whenever a woman has her menstrual period, she will be ceremonially unclean for seven days. Anyone who touches her during that time will be unclean until evening.  Anything on which the woman lies or sits during the time of her period will be unclean.  If any of you touch her bed, you must wash your clothes and bathe yourself in water, and you will remain unclean until evening. If you touch any object she has sat on, you must wash your clothes and bathe yourself in water, and you will remain unclean until evening. This includes her bed or any other object she has sat on; you will be unclean until evening if you touch it (vs 19 – 23).
Jesus is not upset by her action. But acknowledges her faith, and seals her healing.
In these two cases Jesus is touched by those perceived as unclean, but He brings this to a new level in His encounter with the Leper of Matthew 8.

“When Jesus came down from the mountainside, large crowds followed him. A man with leprosy came and knelt before him and said, “Lord, if you are willing, you can make me clean.” Jesus reached out his hand and touched the man. “I am willing,” he said. “Be clean!” Immediately he was cleansed of his leprosy. Then Jesus said to him, “See that you don’t tell anyone. But go, show yourself to the priest and offer the gift Moses commanded, as a testimony to them (vs 1 – 4).”

 

Leprosy is a terrible nerve and flesh disease.  It is highly contagious, and in ancient times those with it were excluded from living within society.  Scripturely Lepers were not only social, but religious outcasts as well.  But, Jesus heals the man.  But the order of events is absolutely powerful.   The man asks for healing, and acknowledges Jesus’ ability to do it.  But while the man was yet “unclean,” Jesus touches him, and says “I am willing.”  Only then does He cure him.  He touched “the untouchable.”  He showed human compassion, beyond that of the priest, Levite, or Pharisee.  He touched first, and healed later.  Think about Mother Theresa’s words, that being wanted and loved, are as important as food or shelter.

This compassion, and disregard of “uncleanliness” was also shown at Nain.

 “Soon afterwards he [Jesus] went to a town called Nain, and his disciples and a large crowd went with him.  As he approached the gate of the town, a man who had died was being carried out. He was his mother’s only son, and she was a widow; and with her was a large crowd from the town. When the Lord saw her, he had compassion for her and said to her, “Do not weep.” Then he came forward and touched the bier, and the bearers stood still. And he said, “Young man, I say to you, rise!”  The dead man sat up and began to speak, and Jesus gave him to his mother (Luke 7: 11 – 15).”

Jesus touched the bier.  He was not like the those who passed by on the other side, as had happened on the road to Jericho.  He was in no doubt as to the man’s state (unlike the priest and Levite), but nonetheless, “touched.”

In God’s love their are none that are “untouchable.”  None are so diseased, sinful, or unlovable that the hand of God is unavailable to them.  Nor should our touch be withheld.

Padre

 

 

 

Reflections of a Disabled Traveller

amCharts (2)

My journeys have spanned decades, though most of my accounts are recently written.   As a young man in the forces, I was able with relative freedom to explore Asia.  As a youngish man I was able to expand my range to North America and Britain. But as I entered “Middle Years,” I have had increasing mobility issues, but nonetheless persist in my enjoyment of travel.

I still occasionally make “day trips” on cheap flights to the Continent to follow-up on my research interests in Holocaust Studies.  But with my wife, have taken to more low key explorations of the UK, and begun taking cruises.

Cruising for someone with limited mobility is a blessing.  Your hotel travels with you. Meals are provided, and once boarded the queues of budget airlines become a distant memory from the past.  With advanced planning and some recourse to offered excursions, interesting things can still be seen and cultures explored.  On non-excursion days with some advanced planning, (with the help of others’ travel blogs and TripAdvisor) good eateries and out of the way sites can be accessed via taxi or in some cases even public transport (thank you all you bloggers that post about routes).

Day travel in the UK and via budget flights makes for some different experiences. In Britain advanced planning and a disabled “Blue Badge” go a long way.  We recently started a programme of visiting  “ancient pubs and coaching inns” (the subject of a future blog I hope).  These provide wonderful atmosphere, a sense of history, and “some mighty fine eats” as well.

This brings us to budget flights.  Okay, with disabled assistance in the airports this is usually not an issue.  Yes, you need to check-in early.  But, for the effort you usually get to your gate with little or no walking.  Usually! I do remember arriving in a regional airport in eastern Poland, and the there being only one wheelchair in the entire place.  It was rickety and well overused.  Discomfort aside, the local officials did decide that even those with disability stand and walk through the securities checks.  Fair enough, with a stick I can manage.

Planning is everything when travelling with mobility issues.  Knowing the location of taxi ranks, and the designations of bus routes is essential.  Once “in country” Hop on, Hop off services are great for getting a feel of the place.  It allows an overview of a city without even having to get out.  This reconnaissance done, priorities can be set of places to go back to.  A quick internet search will usually aid in accessibility information as well, especially for museums and other “tourist friendly” venues.

Going off the beaten path isn’t as easy, but still possible.  Allow time, have the number of a taxi firm and some local currency (as a backup), and go for it.  Thus far it has worked for me.

My ultimate word of encouragement – never give up exploring.

 

Padre